Group Merger Request
Posts: 699
  • Posted On: Jan 3 2004 11:44pm
Don't be hating.
Posts: 4291
  • Posted On: Jan 4 2004 12:03am
Uh, I guess me or Jan. But for the record I don't like the arguments and the opinions of Griff are not nessecarily the opinions of The Galactic Coalition, or mine (I think Gash is pretty cool).

And Simon is right, there is no real Counter-Part on TGC, seeing as how you're th boss of TGC too.
Posts: 2453
  • Posted On: Jan 4 2004 12:23am
Dolash, Griff isn't the actually boss, he just makes suggestions and we usually follow them(though in hindsight there are a few things I would have changed). The real bosses are me and you. Griff is our military adviser(and most issues that we have had concern the military, so it may seem that he is the boss).

Simon, Griff approached us awhile ago on this, and we agreed(after a long discussion). In fact the idea has been kicking around for a long time. Both Dolash and I have agreed to this and accept the merge.

Griff, I was purposely not say, the staff is being biased, but I did raise the same points.

And yes, I for one want to get this merge going. We agreed a while ago the merge would start on the 1st, but Griff managed to post the thread before I could.
Posts: 1549
  • Posted On: Jan 4 2004 7:00am
The thread 'the gungan jedi' is in no way an ORS/GC related thread.

As such, i can't be used as evidence of your membership of said organisation.
  • Posted On: Jan 4 2004 8:28am
Nowhere in the rules does it state that they need to be a part of "group fleet RPs" or the like.

It said they had to be active. He was active and you know it.
Posts: 1549
  • Posted On: Jan 4 2004 9:32am
You're right, not active 'group fleet RPs', merely active group RPs.

Something which 'the gungan jedi' is not. Now shut up unless you have something poignent to add.
  • Posted On: Jan 4 2004 9:41am
Something which 'the gungan jedi' is not. Now shut up unless you have something poignent to add.


I will be the first to always stand up for the staff whenever my groups try to call them biased toward TNO because I know first hand that they aren't, and I try to trust the staff whenever possible.

However this is a blatantly biased attempt to try to manipulate the rules and it's very obvious. I am sorry for any disrespect this shows the staff - I know they work hard to keep this community up - but this is not a legimate try to make sure everything is acted upon within the bounds of the rules.

This is grasping at some way to keep ORS and GC from merging.
Posts: 2915
  • Posted On: Jan 4 2004 9:46am
poign·ant (poinynt)
adj.

Physically painful: “Keen, poignant agonies seemed to shoot from his neck downward” (Ambrose Bierce).
Keenly distressing to the mind or feelings: poignant anxiety.
Profoundly moving; touching: a poignant memory. See Synonyms at moving.
Piercing; incisive: poignant criticism.

Neat, skillful, and to the point: poignant illustrations supplementing the text.
Astute and pertinent; relevant: poignant suggestions.
Agreeably intense or stimulating: poignant delight.
Archaic.
Sharp or sour to the taste; piquant.
Sharp or pungent to the smell.



I felt Ralen needed to know...
  • Posted On: Jan 4 2004 9:49am
<blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>http://pub33.ezboard.com/fswalliancefrm4.showMessage?topicID=2538.topic<hr></blockquote>

And where are Farfalen's members' oh so active RPs on the board concerning fleets, developments and the like?
Posts: 4291
  • Posted On: Jan 4 2004 5:14pm
If it's going to cause such chaos, why not just call it off? It won't make much difference in the long run anyways.

Besides, with Jan and Joren captured IC, I'm the last leader of GC (he he he).