Until you aggree to not use your three different types of missles or the staff makes a decision, the thread is on hold pending a staff decision
Once I asked them to address this issue. (Now I have asked)
I well make a response becuase my response well have no bearing on the combatm. But after that, until this is resolved by staff or we come to an understanding, this thread is on hold.
Lastly there is the issue of your Micro-wave based weapon.
I aggree with the fact that it can pennitrate most matter but not shields
In all of my reading I find that microwaves are just a glorified aspect of the eletro-magnetic spectim.
As such they cannot penitrate an electro-magnetically generated field of energy without first overloading the electromagnetic field in question.
Deflecter shields, conventional shields,
"Magnetogravitic Shield basic starship protection which keeps a ship from burning up while travelling at near-lightspeed in the hyperthin atmosphere of open space. (LCS)"
Star wars encyclopedia.
All such fields would stop your weapon first as they possess strong EM fields.
I aggree that your device is effective I dissagree on the effect.
It first has to over take energy and electromagnetically generated shields before it can penitrate a vessel.
I would ask that the DMB be considered a turbo-laser strengthed weapon against shields. But still hold its purpose of passing through matter onces shields are lost.
No go, the DMB was designed as it is. Deflector arrays are a product of Star Trek, conventional shields dont cover the array the DMB uses. Its all in the DMB description and was approved as such. There will be no changes made to it or how it operates. Magnetogravitic shields in no way mention that they stop microwave beams, it for one thing assumes theres a thin atmosphere in space and prevents a ship from heating up by accelerating at high speeds through it, like a space shuttle droping through the atmosphere. Now you could apply for a staff members intervention on the DMB, but it will not halt the thread as it is an already approved design, and will only alter the effects of the DMB in all threads after, since this has already started. See the Bird of Prey redesign and Shroud redesign for like rulings.
There are no different wavelengths of Microwave technology. Only different levels of power accorded to them.
Microwave energy is Electro-Magnetic energy. And an EM energy cannot pass through another EM generated energy without first overloading or destroying the EM generated sheild. Electomaganetic fields can repell electromagnetic energy.
That may be the case but we have not entered combat. In the case of those rulings IC the weapons have already been used in competitive combat leading to said rulings. So the threads were able to go on becuase the techs were used in IC threads already.
Also note that all shrouds were banned from use during the course of the review process.
So no precident there the thread well be on hold then.
The Bird of Prey is a used president as they were accorded their deadly weakness when the error was found in the stated R&D stats, so there ya go. And the thread has been started, combat or not, so the current R&D stands for the DMB.
anti-protonic field, not EM
While it does have an electromagnetic field, this would in no way hinder a DMB, as the field is not an actual shield itself, but a manner in which to absorb light. Which the DMB is not.
Until stated on by the staff you cannot say anything is for sure in terms of holding.
BOP after the supposed weakness was found. Namely the lack of shields and IC they had been accorded to have shields by friends and foe alike. There being the difference. You have not used it in combat yet there is no problem with IC usage so there is no precident.
"anti-protonic field, not EM."
Can you prove that such an energy field can be created without EM priciples?
Unless you can then you have no case against it having an EM field.
My statement and issue:
"That Electro-magnetic energy cannot pass through a barrier of electromagnetic energy."
Unless you can supply proof from the realm of physical science. Then as far as my Knowledge goes what I stated is true.
considering that you do not aggree with me, I well hold my position until staff comments on the issue.
If a staff member does not respond then the thread is on hold until it is responded to.
and you cannot put a thread on hold, you have not that authority. I have been more than grascious, but it appears to me that your stalling for time. If you dont get into the posting of this thread then we will be going back on our friendly offer of 96 hours and back to the 72 hour rule. Now quit trying to put this thread off and roleplay.
The thread would be on hold if we did not come to a conclusion by then and no staff member attended the issue (Check mechis three thread where staff did not respond in time) that is the case I want to address issues before we continue past 96 hours and I well have a post before 72 have passed.
So if you want us to continue then we best complete this before the time elapses or get a staff member to respond before then.
Anti-protonic fields in SW may have had EM elements is what I was referring to. You had no proof now you have proof.
Now I wait for proof on the EM sheilding element of other said shields or staff intervention.
