Should I destroy the Coalition?
Posts: 1584
  • Posted On: Mar 31 2007 5:41am
only twice?


How about, anyone with the name Clinton...
Posts: 602
  • Posted On: Mar 31 2007 5:47am
Or Lyndon Johnson? Or perhaps Jimmy Carter?
Posts: 2462
  • Posted On: Mar 31 2007 5:48am
Whether or not you agree with Clinton's policies, you'll have a hell of time arguing that George W. Bush was a more effective president...
Posts: 602
  • Posted On: Mar 31 2007 5:55am
Well, at the risk of turning this into a political discussion, I will say that he's killing terrorists in Iraq instead of waiting for them to kill us over here. If Clinton were in office, how many 9/11s might we have suffered before he took action?
Posts: 291
  • Posted On: Mar 31 2007 5:56am
Considering Clinton tried harder to get Osama Bin Laden then Bush ever did, I'd say not many. But this is not a political discussion.
Posts: 1584
  • Posted On: Mar 31 2007 6:14am
Good thing I'm not trying to argue anything like that, Demos. I just think you shoulda picked a higher number. :)



Now. So about this GC...
Posts: 5711
  • Posted On: Mar 31 2007 6:47am
Thread evolution is a bad thing. Burnt people at the stake for less.

people actually like it when the shady guys decide to fight for the good guys


Ahem. It's like you people don't even remember the Anthos Republic.

Ren, Kas: Let slip the dogs of war.
Posts: 1584
  • Posted On: Mar 31 2007 6:58am
You're right, I don't.
Posts: 1621
  • Posted On: Mar 31 2007 1:39pm
I am certainly up for conquering the GC. It would be a massive series of threads filled with espionage, titannic fleet engagements, base delta zeros, civilian casualties, etc etc etc - a massive e amount of space to be annexed by the Empire that is already being bled by war, making a Rebellion easier to start as we would be spread thin.
Posts: 257
  • Posted On: Mar 31 2007 3:21pm
But if say the rebellion thing doesn't work out wouldn't the coaltion just be giving up all of those star systems to the Empire.