Should I feel honoured?
Early today, I recieved a message addressed to me from none other than D. Kil, the very same man to whom I made great mention of in my recent article about the holonet.
The author admits that his true name is not D. Kil (which I knew already, but that is not the issue at hand). He also says that "even a neutral reporter will speak out against great injustice".
But he fails to realize the point! A reporter who speaks out, either way, is not neutral! And D. Kil repeatedly shows his bias with quotes like this:
I find that last quote particularly ammusing, since D. Kil manages to both show his preference to the New Order (defending it at the same time that he slanders the Coalition), and imply that I myself am working for that very Coalition.
If I didn't know that D. Kil was working for the Empire, I might have actually bothered to be moved by that. But then, baseless accusations have never been my type.
This is also of much interest to me:
Who are you then, D. Kil? You are obviously not a member of the Galactic Coalition, and you equally cannot belong to any of the other fringe-groups (for example, the Anthos Republic or the Vinda-Corporation) which have remained entirely neutral in their actions and voices since this combat began.
And who, pray tell, does that leave but the Empire?
No, Mr. Kil. You have said enough for the Empire. Reporting against the Coalition in such a way instantly puts the Empire in a better light, whether you mean to or not (and, as I've said, I'm sure that it your intention).
It has nothing to do with the New Order? But Mr. Kil, the Coalition is at war with the Empire! Anything that effects the Coalition, then, also effects the Empire.
And if this has nothing to do with the Empire, why did you write me a paragraph on how it has nothing to do with them?
Allow me to ask one last question of D. Kil. If these Racial Riots were as big as you claim, why is yours the only story relating to them?
I'm sure this is the sort of thing that would easily get out. Look at the public demonstrations on Abregado-rae that have led to that world's rejection of the Coalition government. They've been all over the newsgrids.
Why do these riots gain attention only from an "independent" reporter?
Early today, I recieved a message addressed to me from none other than D. Kil, the very same man to whom I made great mention of in my recent article about the holonet.
The author admits that his true name is not D. Kil (which I knew already, but that is not the issue at hand). He also says that "even a neutral reporter will speak out against great injustice".
But he fails to realize the point! A reporter who speaks out, either way, is not neutral! And D. Kil repeatedly shows his bias with quotes like this:
I find that last quote particularly ammusing, since D. Kil manages to both show his preference to the New Order (defending it at the same time that he slanders the Coalition), and imply that I myself am working for that very Coalition.
If I didn't know that D. Kil was working for the Empire, I might have actually bothered to be moved by that. But then, baseless accusations have never been my type.
This is also of much interest to me:
Who are you then, D. Kil? You are obviously not a member of the Galactic Coalition, and you equally cannot belong to any of the other fringe-groups (for example, the Anthos Republic or the Vinda-Corporation) which have remained entirely neutral in their actions and voices since this combat began.
And who, pray tell, does that leave but the Empire?
No, Mr. Kil. You have said enough for the Empire. Reporting against the Coalition in such a way instantly puts the Empire in a better light, whether you mean to or not (and, as I've said, I'm sure that it your intention).
It has nothing to do with the New Order? But Mr. Kil, the Coalition is at war with the Empire! Anything that effects the Coalition, then, also effects the Empire.
And if this has nothing to do with the Empire, why did you write me a paragraph on how it has nothing to do with them?
Allow me to ask one last question of D. Kil. If these Racial Riots were as big as you claim, why is yours the only story relating to them?
I'm sure this is the sort of thing that would easily get out. Look at the public demonstrations on Abregado-rae that have led to that world's rejection of the Coalition government. They've been all over the newsgrids.
Why do these riots gain attention only from an "independent" reporter?